|
HISTORY OF RADIO PROJECT
Levy and SERS Formation
- Level put to voters in 1996 - failed.
- Restart by public safety officials in
1997 led to renewed look at 800 MHz
- Project restarted in 1998.
- System manager hired in 1998 by E911.
- Snohomish County underwrites project costs
using councilmatic bonds.
- SERS (Snohomish Emergency Radio System)
formed in 1999.
CURRENT SITUATION
Operational Constraints
- Existing policy/fire/EMS radio channels
routinely get overloaded with local and distant radio "traffic."
- Existing system doesn't provide for silent,
reliable policy office or firefighter "officer in distress" signaling
to others.
- Wide-area communications between field
units is not possible.
- Uneven radio coverage of the service area.
- No ability to exert positive control over
lost or stolen radios.
- Difficult to add more users to any of
the existing channels, and communication system configuration limits
usefulness of added personnel.
- Few alternate channels exist for tactical
use (such as narcotics task force, ERT, firescene, hazmat, and logistical
support).
- No encrypted radio channels for secure
communications.
- Existing radio equipment is 5 - 15 years
old.
FCC Refarming Initiative
- Need for added spectrum-crated spectrum
refarming.
- FCC rule changes now in effect create
likelihood of harmful interference to operations: Washington State DNR
has already begun licensing channels.
- Rules will cause further potential for
problems at second channel split in 2005.
- Change is needed for VHF systems now.
Fragile Infrastructure
- The existing infrastructure supporting
VHG systems Is very fragile.
- This includes towers, buildings, power
sources, and connectivity to comm centers.
- Earthquake will severely cripple all public
safety communications in Sno County.
- "Near disaster" (floods, snow- and windstorms)
will compromise public safety communications.
UPGRADE AND REPLACEMENT OPTIONS
- VHF/UFH: No opportunity to grow
- 800 MHz: Available
- 700 MHz: No Allocation, no service
rules, no treaty
- Commercial Services: Poor coverage in
rural areas, poor reliability, cannot restore directly after failure
- Satellite: No service into structures,
costly, no ability to repair easily with failure
AVAILABLE OPTIONS:
"Refarming Safe" VHF
- Addresses need to prepare for interference
potential due to refarming.
- Moderate cost/Small benefit
- Does not solve capacity, safety, performance
or infrastructure survivability problems.
- No additional wide area channels available.
- Must do it all again in 2005!
800 MHz Trunked System
- Addresses all needs in a single integrated
program -- solves all known problems and provides significant operational
enhancements.
- Creates durable infrastructure for the
future.
- Expensive but huge benefit -- 800 MHz
trunking offers the best cost/benefit ratio.
- Compatible with next generation 700 MHz
Washington State statewide system.
- Includes government VHF alphanumeric paging
system for police/fire/EMS participants.
800 MHz: Why are Agencies Participating?
- Integration with all fire/EMS and law
enforcement system in Snohomish County.
- Increased system capacity and capabilities.
- Better area coverage than existing systems.
- Distress signaling from all radios.
- Secure communications available with digital
radios.
- Reliable equipment, upgraded towers and
buildings.
- Improved comm centers with redundant dispatch
capability and alphanumeric paging.
INVESTMENT IN THE FUTURE: Investment
Lifetimes
- Mobile/portable radios have a useful lifetime
of 7 to 10 years (approx. 12% of project cost).
- Fixed radio equipment has a useful life
of 10 to 15 years (approx. 25% of project cost).
- Microwave equipment has a useful life
of 15 to 25 years (approx. 12% of project cost).
- Physical infrastructure (buildings. Towers)
I assumed to have a life of 25 years plus! (approx. 24% of project cost)
- "missing" percentage is engineering cost.
SERS System: Project Implementation
Timeline
- 1999-2002: Phase One - Southwest Snohomish
County
- 2001-2004: Phase Two - North and East
Snohomish County
- Project is six months behind schedule
due to tower development delays
- The first phase of the system expected
to begin operation in July of 2002
- Initial site development begun for Phase
Two
COUNTY-WIDE SYSTEM: Expenditure
by Phase
PHASE ONE: $21.4 Million
PHASE TWO: $12.8 Million
APPENDICES
APPENDIX ONE: Participants
Phase One:
- Everett Fire, Lynnwood Fire, Mountlake
Terrace Fire, Edmonds Fire, Mukilteo Fire, FD1, area hospitals
- Everett Police, Lynnwood Police, Mountlake
Terrace Police, Edmonds Police, Woodway Police, Brier Police, Marysville
Police, Mill Creek Police, Mukilteo Policy, Snohomish County Sheriff's
office
- ESCA, DEM, SNOPAC, SNOCOM, Marysville
Dispatch, Washington State Patrol (Dispatch)
Phase Two:
- Snohomish Police, Monroe Police, Lake
Stevens
- Fire District 7, District 4, other districts
indicated commitment
- Snohomish County Health District
APPENDIX TWO: Interoperability
- Proposed system significantly improves
mutual aid and interoperability with all agencies in Snohomish and King
counties.
- Ability to work cooperatively in tactical
situations greatly improves through added regional channels/talk groups.
- Communications with non-800 MHz users
are enhanced via links to VHF (LERN, Fire Tac).
- Airlift NW has 800 MHz radios in aircraft.
- Improved communications with hospitals
and state prison.
APPENDIX THREE: Radio System Area Coverage
- First fully "engineered" radio system
in county.
- Design is for 95% in-building coverage
in populated areas, medium density.
- King County system designed for less than
95% ON STREET (no in-building service).
- Sites can be added if coverage is not
acceptable in any areas.
- Spare sites have been purchased to allow
site additions if required (1 per phase).
- There will be areas where coverage is
not perfect…but solutions do exist
APPENDIX FOUR: In-building Coverage
Ordinance
- SERS staff drafted model language for
"in-building coverage" ordinance.
- Seeks to ensure that developers of large
new commercial and public facilities provide for public safety communications
inside large structures.
- Further development required. Our goal
is to bring the issue before county council in 2002
APPENDIX FIVE: System Fallbacks
- Wide are trunking -- normal operations
- Site trunking (within east simulcast cell)
- Failsoft (wide area simulcast/voted but
no trunking)
- Wide area conventional interoperability
systems (ICALL and ITAC 1-4)
- Simplex (five statewide, plus 165 SERS
licensed -- can set up bases at fire stations)
- Deployable portable repeaters
APPENDIX SIX: The "VHF World" is Changing
- Agencies which remain on VHF are changing
the nature of their systems significantly.
- USFS is moving totally to narrowband analog
VHF in 2005.
- DNR is moving to APCO Project 25 digital.
- Railroads are looking at P25 digital.
- WSP will either go P25 digital or 700
MHz digital.
- SERS interoperability infrastructure will
probably be narrowband analog
APPENDIX SEVEN: Northeast Area Sites
- Frailey Mountain - Primary
- Eagle Ridge - Primary
- North Mountain / Gold Mountain - Secondary
|