|
NEWS
SOURCES:
Everett
Herald, Seattle-PI,
Seattle
Times, Sacramento
Bee, Wall
Street Journal, NY
Times, Chicago
Tribune, Wired
Magazine, Associated
Press, LA
Times, Washington
Post, Drudge
Report, Yahoo,
G.R.I.T.
Updates
NEWS
ARTICLES
New
Breaking
ground on $33 million improvements to Hwy. 9, what the Herald dubs "Snohomish
County lifeline." Yet no state funding was allotted for U.S.
2 improvements. U.S. 2 is the lifeline (especially in an emergency) not
only to the coonty but to the state and points east of Washington State,
as well as to the impending new-growth cities and gravel extraction areas..
(Don't forget: it is not just a county or state road, but a United States
federal highway!)
Critical
slope gave no warning before collapsing onto I-90, killing three (Hey,
that's why it's called a "critical" slope. Sort of like the
25% to 50% slopes on the latest council mistake, approval of the "Timber
Ridge" plat: It will give very little warning before a "house-slide"
occurs. But YOU can help: Pray for dry weather. Always.)
Seattle
Times
article - How
Barclays North has taken over Sultan
Taskforce
Hearings on NEPA draws strong support
Republican leaders of the U.S. House of Reps Resources Committee formed
the task force to study the future of NEPA, but their first hearing in
Spokane drew a slightly different crowd than anticipated. READ PI's
Joel Connelly opinion on federal hearings at a local level.
Other
info related to NEPA hearings:
Also
of interest related to the Sultan-Pombo connection, are the true grass
roots efforts by Sultan UGA resident Ed Husmann (including the FORESTS
FOR PEOPLE,***with which he is at least
closely affiliated and includes a good deal of anti-Wild Sky info). Mr.
Husmann has been stumping for Pombo's efforts to block Wild Sky, as evidenced
by his local contacts through ORV (off-road vehicles) and snowmobiler
clubs. Among them is the Boeing Employee's Stump Thumpers 4x4/ORV club
and a Washington snowmobiling club (click
here for details as webpage or in
Word) via newsletters and message board activity.
***Interestingly,
nowhere on this website is: a phone number, an address or an owner's(s')
name(s). A search for it in the Wash. St. Secty. of State Corporation's
database reveals nothing.
OTHER
"STUFF"
DISCUSSION,
OPINION & MESSAGE FORUM

RECORDING
WARS
(When the City tried to stop G.R.I.T. from recording
public meetings)
FOOD BANK:
Put a pre-addressed food bank envelope in your "bills to pay" folder and
send a check monthly: $5, $10, whatever you can spare!
For
more info, click here.
|
-
COUNTY:
Democratic voters
made the intelligent choice for Dist.
5's County council candidate, rejecting
Steve Hobbs in favor of Dave Somers,
the party's official standard bearer.
(Steve Hobbs, after promising to accept
the party's candidate during the July
convention, threw his promise in the
trashcan by campaigning with pre-prepared
materials the day after the convention's
choice (Somers) was made. SO IT'S SOMERS
v. SAX, a rerun for the 2001 election.
This time, however, Sax's promise to
"fix" traffic will ring as
hollow as his head often seems to be.
-
CORRECTION,
with apologies- The
reason? A giant Webmaster brain-blip.
Paul Price and Dorothy Croshaw will
square off for this council position.
My preivous statement below makes it
sound like Paul Price was the winner
and would run against another opponent.
[Duh....] LOCAL: In
Gold Bar, voters wisely opted
for incumbent Paul Price for Council
Position #1 (42.44% of the vote), rejecting
previous councilwoman Dorothy Croshaw
(37.82% of vote), who aligned herself
last year with the contentious Joan
Amenn, wife of sitting councilman and
mayoral candidate Robert Amenn, who
was (thankfully) an also-ran with only
18.91% of the vote. We are crossing
our fingers that the Gold Bar voters
will turn out in droves to defeat Mr.
Amenn. Mr. Amenn was the moving force
behind the botched and no-basis recall
attempt toward Mayor Hawkins, whose
self-interests, aggressively-offensive
political tactics and lack of regard
for legal process has brought council
meetings to a virtual standstill over
the last two years.
-
FD
#5 Levy: Approved 56.14%, rejected
43.86%
New!
COMPLETE
AUDIO from Sept. 14, 2005 Sultan Council
Meeting (Be
sure to listen to Jim Flower's statements
regarding "Red Tape" at the
end of the request for a sewer plan amendment.
Our question is: Do you really
want a legislative representative who
advocates dissolution of, and/or skipping
the legal process?)
NEW
& UPDATED (9/20) LEGALS & OTHER
NOTICES:
-
Publication
of Ordinance
885-05 and Ordinance
886-05, revising open space and
recreational codes to conform to a GMA-mandated
appeal decision by Fallgatter/Kirkman.
(These two legal notices have not been
sent to us by the city as required,
and it has not yet been posted on the
city's new website.)
-
-
NOTICE:
Thursday, 9/29 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
for a new Sultan 39-unit condominium
townhouse development called "AJs
Place" located on First Street
between High and Gohr Road (in Word)
There are no signs posted on the property(ies),
announcing this event to interested
parties.
-
Legal
Notice - Council Hearing on revisions
to PUD
code set for Wed., September 28th,
6:00 PM. Note: This legal notice
has not yet been posted on the City's
website, nor was it emailed to us. (There
is also a continuation of the PC's hearing
on this subject this Tuesday, 9/20 at
7:00 PM. It is highly suggested that
anyone wishing to make comments on the
city's requested revisions to this code,
attend or submit testimony in writing.
For more information on this important
subject, click here.)
New!
One of two keys to unlocking Sultan's
future development: Here's
the 2005/06 draft Sewer Comprehensive
Plan (The other key, of course, are
studies and improvements for future traffic
and transportation.)
What
is wrong with this picture? The City
has clearly taken a wring-their-hands-wailing-"We
did not know this development was coming"-position
on the issue of planning for sewer capacity.
Well, what did the council and mayor think
would happen as they recommended, then
approved, a steady parade of developer-friendly
codes over the past two to three years,
along with a Comprehensive Plan carrying
an explosively-bloated UGA area? Pul-eeze!
At least give voters and taxpayers
credit for more brains than that. When
you actively engage in attracting, courting,
encouraging and soliciting developers
to build here, what is the result? Ignorance
is not bliss, it is expensive --
to the taxpayers of Sultan in direct-pay-taxes
for needed infrastructure, and to all
taxpayers across the county, state and
country in the form of the grants required
to sustain Sultan's addiction to low-hanging
funds from temporary permit fees from
long-term development.
Bottom
line: How could a sewer plan be approved
in November, 2004 for one development
scenario (lower growth), then only two
months later in January, 2005 during the
City Council Retreat, see the City Administrator/City
Planner present a slide show advising
the council of 1,000-plus homes in the
next few years, and not realize there
was a problem with the sewer capacity
until August, 2005? The answer, my friends,
is, at a minimum, misfeasance. Although
Mayor Tolson has been doing his best (and
succeeding, to some extent) to make up
for many years of serious mistakes and
purposeful overisghts by previous mayors
and councils, he has allowed to go unchecked
a serious problem within the city staff
that needs to be corrected immediately
before more long-term financial damage
is done. (WE WILL POST DOCUMENTS SHORTLY
ON THE STATUS OF THE SEWER TREATMENT PLAN
CURRENT CAPACITY.)
New!
Legal Notices (and other notices):
-
-
- ALSO,
the Friends of the Sultan Library have a new president AND a website:
Carole Nichols is their new president, and the Friends
now have a website.
-
-
HERE'S
A HEAD-SCRATCHER QUESTION: If the City believes it's appropriate
to post a notice about the Sportsman's Club's 9/11 Duck Race (a private
event by a private non-profit corporation that has nothing to do
with government in any way, shape or form and was strictly for FUN), then
why haven't they posted a direct link to our G.R.I.T. website, which contains
more city documents and "hard" factual information than the
City will ever post in its lifetime? ANSWER: First, the
Sultan Sportsman's Club seems to have some very powerful connections at
city hall. Second (and this is the REAL reason), as is the case with most
government entities, the City despises having someone looking over their
shoulder. Sad, but oh-so-true.
LEGAL
NOTICE: Hearing on revising PUD ordinance
(in Word)
to increase minimum
lot sizes to 5,000 s.f. --
AND -- decrease the min. PUD development
area from 5 acres to 2 acres.
The hearing was held Tuesday, September
6th, 7:00 PM, before Sultan's Planning
Commission (but will be continued t o
9/20), 319 Main Street (This
notice, as well as many other recent legals,
have not been sent to us, nor have they
been posted on the city's website.)
UPDATE
9/1/05 re PUD revisions and Tuesday's
PC HEARING: Cyd Donk emailed
us, finally, on (9/1/05) the LEGAL
NOTICE (in Word)
on the DNS for these changes issued 7/14/05.
Because the comment period for this action
ended July 28th, it's a bit late for anyone
to submit input on the environmental impacts
to the city on this proposed code change.
ALONG THIS LINE
OF THINKING, when the subject
of a "PUD revision" was first
broached by the council, it was assumed
that Councilwoman Kristina Blair's request
to clarify the two "confusing"
codes, which seemingly presented city
staff and city council problems in properly
interpreting two ordinances dealing with
sensitive areas on critical slopes (SMC
16.68.060) and inadequate wetland buffer
areas on slopes (re "innovative design")
during the preliminary plat approval of
TIMBER RIDGE. These codes, which were
at the heart of the City Staff recommendations
to Council, and the Council's highly-questionable
decision to approve the Timber Ridge preliminary
plat, ignoring and overturning Hearing
Examiner Galt's recommendations, scream
for attention -- ESPECIALLY considering
Garth York's new preliminary plat application
for yet another future development
on critical slopes (located on Love's
Hill, between the bluff and 8th street).
Unless the city gets a firm grip on working
with property owners and developers on
what constitutes SAFE development on critical
slopes (and we're talking STEEEEEEEP slopes
here, folks!), then Sultan should be renamed
"New California."
New
(9/5)!
Sultan's 1999 "Sultan Basin Road Concept Plan,"
included
as part of a new G.R.I.T. webpage report titled, "The
Future Face of the Sultan Basin Road," graphically
reveals the grievous growth "planning" for the
Sultan Basin, first during Rowe's administration, and
more recently during Tolson's, due primarily to Rick Cisar's
seeming-incompetence and/or purposeful oversight.
Recent
and ongoing -
Budget documents from 8/31 Council Workshop (all
files in pdf): City
budgets from 2000 through YTD 2005 (33 out of 52 weeks
for 2005, with financial reports inserted between spreadsheets
(770 kb file). Here is the report
with the budget spreadsheets only (580 kb), and here
are the financial
reports only (243 kb)
Recent
and ongoing - August's
council 2006 budget workshop/preview:
Council's "wish list" included: Increase
the retail sales tax base...Implementaton of a stormwater
utility...Better funding sources for Sultan Police Department...New
personnel, including a new building inspector/code enforcement
officer, parks manager/maintenance person, animal control
office, and a long-needed records clerk for the SPD (evidence-handling
chores leave city open to potential and substantial liabilities)....Better
street and sidewalk maintenance and improvements...."Contingency"/"Savings
account" fund for sewer improvements (had one, but
was spent out during Rowe's administration)....Make city
codes consistent....To always set aside
sewer capacity availability for commercial business (this
from Derek Boyd)....From Rick Cisar, most critical area/plan
for the city to accomplish is its Critical Areas Ordinance
(needed so the city can continue to secure grant approval).
BEST OF ALL -- Glory be! -- a workable sound and
recording system!!! Yea! Many, many years past due. Donna
Murphy mentioned Galt's comment that the city could face
problems if there is an appeal of a city decision (such
as the recent Timber Ridge decision*). He knows what we
have known for many years: The city tapes are virtually
unintelligible.
*Re
Timber Ridge, we and another party, during our intended
appeal of of this BAD CITY DECISION, were advised by our
attorney that we did not have standing. Thus, thousands
of current and future users of the Sultan Basin Road will
be exposed to a major safety concerns on this roadway,
and will have to pay for needed improvements to the road,
the expense for which should have been shared and borne
by the developers of Timber Ridge: The very, very sad
result of a stupid decision by both the City (Cisar and
its consultant, Paul Ingrahm of Berryman & Henniger)
and this council.
Recent
and ongoing - Aug.
17 Seattle Times article about a "900 lb.
gorilla," otherwise known as Barclays North (Sultan
is the focus of this story, with comments by David Toyer,
Mayor Ben Tolson, Loretta Storm and Sultan Councilman
Jim Flower highlighted.)
Recent
- Audio
files of 8/10/05 VAN WYNGARDEN ANNEXATION MEETING
in two parts in MP3 format: Part
1 (4.5 mb) - mostly public comment); and Part
2 (5.1 mb), remaining public comment and questions
and discussion from council. (This does not include council's
questions, discussion and vote on this issue during the
council meeting.) In a surprising result, the annexation
was denied. For now...
OTHER
ACTIONS DURING 8/10 COUNCIL MTG:
Moratorium on PUDs was passed, hearing will be
held within 60 days (but the number of pipeline development
exclusions pulls much of its teeth); council support
for FD #5 Levy lift (recent astounding assessor
tax increases does not affect, or help, the FD); Ordinance
882 (Binding site plans) and 823 (budget amend for WWTP
dump truck) passed unanimously.
Recent
-
Does a strong police presence deter crime and have
a positive financial impact on a city? Here's
an article from Civic Strategies and the study on
which it was based. With the traditional financial guillotine
hanging over Fred's Head as the annual budget process
nears, we thought this was a timely subject. This budgetary
process is particularly important, considering ..... (click)
And
while we're on ths subject of LEVELS OF SERVICE mandated
by the Comp Plan (a financial exercise that, according
to the GMA, needs to be performed annually in concert
with the budeting process), here are a couple of key service
levels as published in Sultan's 2004 Comprehensive Plan:
-
Firefighters/EMTs
(these are lumped together as a single job function
in the CP (FD #5): 1/2 FF/EMT per 1,000 population (or
a total of 8.8 FF/EMTs)
-
School
Students (K-12) - ratio per dwelling unit: existing
and future LOS (per CP) is 0.603, with the "existing
supply" at 1,675. (I honestly do not know what
"existing supply" means. However, luckily,
there is a Sultan School District special meeting on
MONDAY, 7/25 to discuss the budget, with a Board of
Directors meeting following to adpt the School's 2005/2006
budget (see info on meetings at right.)
-
Parks:
LOS is 42.6 acres per 1,000 population. The "existing"
figure in the CP states the "supply" (or existing
"Parks" which includes all city-owned buildings
and property, including city hall, the fire station,
schools, public works facilities buildings, etc.) is
162.4 acres/7,074,144 s.f. although the LOS should be
174.7 acres/7,609,932, a deficit of 12./3 acres/535,7888
s.f. The LOS for next year looks even worse: With an
estimated 4,400 population, the city should have a total
of 187.4 acres of "park" (again, remember
this category also includes all city-owned buildings
and structures). This means
the City will register a DEFICIT in this category of
25 acres, or 1,089,000 s.f. next uear. Note:
These figures do not include any new "parks"
being provided by the Sky Harbor development, and it
is our understanding that both Stratford Place and Denali
Ridge did not provide any park or recreational areas,
choosing instead to pay a fee in lieu of providing an
actual park or recreational area, a code that was successfully
appealed by Planning Commissioners Josie Fallgatter
and Jeff Kirkman earlier this year.
Recent
- Audio
of 6-yr Road Plan Hearing (will be continued 7/27), and
complete audio of JULY 13th COUNCIL MEETING
(NOTE: The audio from the June 22nd council meeting will
be posted later this week; the audio for the closed record
hearing on Timber Ridge, which occurred during the 6/22
meeting, will not be posted until expiration of the appeal
period for that decision.)
Recent
- Audio
and council summary of June 8, 2005 Meeting (Also:
Transcription
of Fallgatter and Kirkman's public comments concerning
the City's broken Settlement Agreement with them, and
comments from Jim Flower, Mayor Tolson, et al., re same
subject (in Word,
Acrobat)
Mayor
Tolson and the Sultan Council have approved in concept
a detailed evaluation and review of the various positions
held by City staff.
HERE IS THE PROPOSAL from the Prothman Company to
perform this study and evaluation. It was agreed in principle
(to be approved in fact through either a consent agenda
or action agenda action) that this project would begin
with a brief and inexpensive $1,000 overview report and
project scoping, with future approval and costs to perform
a full-blown study. (Mayor Tolson and the council should
be commended for taking this first step to increase/enhance
the level of professionalism within City Hall.)
|
ONGOING
& VITAL FUTURE PROBLEM REQUIRES IMMEDIATE ACTION by Sultan Council:
SULTAN
BASIN ROAD STUDY/EIS REQUIRED FOR FUTURE IMPACTS FROM DEVELOPMENTS
This
10-car back-up waiting to turn westward onto Hwy. 2 from Sultan
Basin Road (there
were 2 cars behind me not shown in this photo) will look oh-so-tame
once in-construction build-out occurs (62 homes in Sky Harbor, 15
in Denali Ridge, with several hundred more homes in the offing,
as stated gleefully by City Admin/Planner Cisar. Even with the new
channelization improvements progressing, and new plans for traffic
signalization at SBR/Hwy. 2, not much will change, insofar as capacity
on the Basin Road is concerned. HOWEVER, when asked about
the need (wisdom) for the Council to adopt the old June, 1999 "Sultan
Basin Road Concept Plan" ( how to address capacity-related
problems caused by too-fast growth on the Basin), or better yet,
perform a NEW capacity study (a no-brainer) or an EIS (more appropriate)
on this endangered roadway, Rick Cisar simply said there was no
need for one. (And, Rick, could you remind me again "On what
planet are you living?")
|

Just
a small taste of Sultan's future (Even WITH planned improvements
to U.S.2 and SBR):Sultan
Basin Road on a typical Sunday afternoon..... There was no accident,
no distracting events on this day; nothing but lots and lots of
typically-heavy Sunday traffic.
|
- During
the July 5, 2005 PC meeting...
Commissioner Dalmasso requested that the PC approve non-existent ordinances:
What's more expedient than trying to slip through a zoning overlay to
benefit a property you represent for sale? Why, passing ordinances onto
council for disposition without even having an ordinance prepared or
reviewed by the PC! It's such a time-saver. (Hey, we all know this "Follow
the Process" stuff simply gets in the way of the "real"
business of Sultan's PC: With its current mix of a real estate broker
(Dalmasso), a past and previous developer who is married to a real estate
broker (chairman Ray George), and a property owner whose property, we
understand, is once again under contract to Barclays North (Tom Green),
the Commission cannot be bothered with something as trivial as adhering
to professional process.
- Commissioner
Dalmasso asked to move the 9-lot short plat and wetland banking
ordinances -- which do not yet exist -- from the Discussion to Action
agenda so they can be given to the council to act upon. His reason?
"The attorney is going to write the ordinance anyway."
Hel-LO???? This man is so-o-o out of control, Mr. Mayor. His removal
is long overdue.
- Other
things that happened during the 7/5 PC meeting:
- Commissioner
Dalmasso
(and Chairman Ray George, too, to a certain extent) objected to
Commissioner Fallgatter's insistence that when development regulations
requiring consistency with the Comp Plan are proposed (by either
the council/planner/city, a property owner or a PC member), that
the legal petition process be used. (Our understanding is that
a procedure has been written, but it has never published or used
by the City.). In a private discussion with me following the meeting,
Mr. Dalmasso argued that the process should not be followed because,
"This city needs to grow. We must grow or die!"
My response: "Make up your mind, Bart. One night you're arguing
to the County Council that Sultan has become a ghost town, and
the next week you're arguing to local corporate Bank of America
folks stating they should not close the Sultan branch because
of how fast it's growing."
- Commissioner
Tom Green would not recuse himself from the Binding Site Plan
hearing (or discussions or the decision), when requested by me.
Mr. Green and his partner own property within the Sultan Scenic
Business Park, and the development implementation tool for those
properties is the binding site plan. My opinion is that, as a
man of honor, Mr. Green would prefer to eliminate any
appearance of conflict by voluntarily removing himself from these
proceedings to avoid any hint of special interests. So
we're a bit confused at his reaction.
- Former
Councilman Jimmy Porter showed up, along with Dan Barmon of
Barmon Lumber, to testify. Neither were aware of the requirement
to financially contribute to required future infrastructure needs
(i.e., the east-west-running North Wagley Connector Road). They
were also unaware that residential properties contained within
the Scenic Biz Park (i.e., ALL properties within the LID 97-1
area), specifically Timber Ridge and an approx. 40-50 additional
acres, are NOT required to do so, because Mr. Cisar removed residential
zoning from the current configuration of the Binding Site Plan.
Timber Ridge has been given a free ride, while Barmon and other
commercial property owners must join a "no protest"
LID to pay for necessary infrastructure improvements in the LID
97-1 area, along with the Sultan taxpayers, who must pick up Timber
Ridge's financial burden for this future roadway. Regardless of
how many times this situation was explained to Mr. Porter, he
simply did not "get it."
- Ongoing
Issue: Did
Jim Flower(and Bart Dalmasso) break the City's settlement agreement
with Fallgatter/Kirkman when he testified at the June 1, 2005 county
comp plan 10-year update hearing? This
letter from Mayor Tolson pretty much puts paid to that question.
-
UPDATED
(6-17) -
BARCLAYS NORTH HAS WITHDRAWN THE PROPOSED
VAN WYNGARDEN PETITION ANNEXATION
to annex 60-plus acres. If annexed, it
would have resulted in 199 new S.F. homes,
adding 617 (min.) new people to Sultan's
population. The reason for the withdrawal
is because they could not achieve the
additoinal 4% in property valuation required
for the petition. (Our question, of course,
is why was it ever brought before the
council in that condition?) Don't get
too excited yet, folks: BNI will simply
try Door #2 or #3 to achieve their goals.
Available Documents on this issue.
City's
Agenda Cover Sheet from May 25, 2005 council
meeting (as Acrobat
file, as Word
document). The council vote on whether or
not to accept this petition has been delayed until
the June 22nd council meeting)
-
NEW
6/15/05 - In the midst of
personal harassment and constant and overwhelming criticism,
and without an attorney, a safety net and without any legal
training or background, Josie Fallgatter and Jeff Kirkman appealed
decisions made by a City without a clue.
Fallgatter
& Kirkman recent appeal of the Rick Cisar-recommended
Sultan Comprehensive Plan, which was approved
by council based on his advice, resulted in
a City-requested settlement
agreement (which Councilman Jim Flower and
PC member Bart Dalmasso promptly broke). Their
appeal of City ordinances 853-04 and 854-04
(park fees "in lieu of") has resulted
in a Final
Order and Decision by the Growth Management
Hearings Board (in Word)
which validates their appeal of these ordinances.
Fallgatter/Kirkman
have been subjected to extreme criticism by city officials because
of the taxpayer funds expended on "attorneys' fees."
To this we say, "Poppycock & Bull feathers." These
were City Administrator/City Planner Cisar-recommended actions.
If Fallgatter and Kirkman can represent themselves in their
appeals of incorrect legal decisions by the City, why does the
City need to hire an attorney to argue its case? If the original
advice from Cisar was solidly supportable on legal grounds,
why didn't Cisar represent the City in these appeals? (The answer
to that question raises a nasty set of competency questions,
as far as we're concerned.)
-
Ongoing
- Info on yet another weapon in the
developer's arsenal to decimate taxpayers' (and Nature's)
quality of life and simultaneously increasing taxes
along with development density: WETLAND
BANKING (as presented during Sultan's June 7, 2005
PC meeting, which fulfilled "half" of the
request by Commissioners to "hear both sides"
of this story.)
- AUDIO
(MP3) of 6/1/05 Joint County PC/council Hearing Testimony by Sultan
officials: Mayor
Tolson, Councilman
Flower, and Planning Commissioners Fallgatter
and Dalmasso
(Councilmember
Flower, in his comments on adding Sultan's watershed to the UGA, broke
the City's settlement agreement with Fallgatter/Kirkman.)
- As
part of the City-requested Fallgatter/Kirkman GMA appeal Settlement
agreement (approved by the Sultan Council 5/25/05) an opinion that
outlines the majority view of Planning Commissioners as well as one
representing the minority opinion of Plng. Commissioners was granted.
Here is the MAJORITY
OPINION authored by Bart Dalmasso, representing the views of Planning
Commissioners Ray George, Tom Green, Janie Botting and Dalmasso), and
here is the MINORITY
OPINION of Commissioners Fallgatter and Kirkman. (Which report,
based on its content, reflects your opinion of how Sultan's future
planning should occur?)
- Recent
& ongoing: Documents
related to the City-requested mediation of the Fallgatter/Kirkman
appeal of the City's 2005 comprehensive plan. These are all in a
.pdf Acrobat format:
- Thom
Graafstra May 13th letter to Mediator Margery Hite, plus attachments:
- Attach.
A & B: emailed discussions re mediation
- Attach.
C & D: email re mediation (Att. C) and copy of SMC 16.134,
Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment Procedures (Att. D)
- Attach.
E: Copy of "Development Regulation Amendment Procedures
and Public Hearing and Participation Process" (a "public"
document that was unpublished and has never, to our knowledge, been
used, despite numerous code (comp plan) amendment actions.
- Attach.
F: Index of Comp Plan Update documents
- Attach.
G: Feb. 27, 2004 CTED letter to City re comp plan
- Attach.
H thru J: various
- Fallgatter/Kirkman
Mediation Presentation
(2 mb file)
- Settlement
agreement (accepted and approved May 25, 2005 by city council)
- Ongoing
- SULTAN'S REMAINING SEWER
CAPACITY: The answer is contained within a letter
from Berryman & Heniger's John Wilson to the City, which helps explain
that (in acrobat), which includes a more detailed summary of the
remaining, and Cisar-estimated capacity, property-by-property. (summary
only as webpage,, in Word
or in
pdf)
- Ongoing
- Transcription
(as web page, as Word)
of Cisar Presentation to Sultan's Planning Commission May 3, 2005, on
the subject of Sultan's Future Growth, which
answers the following questions:
- What
is Sultan's current and future sewer capacity?
- Why
is the City organizing a contingent of city officials and private
economic development interests to shout out loud to the county council
that it needs to support the Cisar- and city council-recommended
comp plan UGA (regardless of the appeal by Planning Commissioners
Josie Fallgatter and Jeff Kirkman at the Growth Management Hearings
Board currently in mediation at the City's request)?
- Why
is City Administrator/Planner Rick Cisar recommending that a Sultan
sewer line expansion be tunnelled southward under the BNSF Railroad
to service 20 acres in a crtical area (an action that is not included
or even mentioned in either Sultan's Comp plan or CFP)?
- Why
is City Administrator/Planner Cisar engaging in detailed discussions
with a property owner about annexing his land into the city limits
(located in Sultan's UGA north of Pleasant View), when the comp
plan and CFP has not even been approved?
- Why
is City Administrator/Planner Rick Cisar urging that another 1,200
single family homes be built in the next few years (3,240 new people,
almost doubling Sultan's current population), with no financial
plan on how the city can support such growth?
- We
will be posting a representation of the map Cisar presented during
this meeting (as well as the one at the 4/30 Council Retreat), which
was pock-marked with red dots showing an epidemic of proposed growth
areas. Mr. Cisar identified properties and offered explanations
for projects that are inside the planning pipeline already (i.e.,
Stratford Place, Timber Ridge, Denali Ridge, etc.), or soon will
be, as he continues to let the developers run the show, rather than
the other way around. Despite the poor audio quality (Rick felt
obliged to use the City's noisy overhead projector to display his
"measle-marked" map, despite the absence of any citizens
that evening), this transcription represents our best effort at
capturing Mr. Cisar's words.
|
SULTAN
PLNG. COMMISSION ANTICS (as predicted):
The
Commission discussed Bart Dalmasso's unnanounced
and unnoticed action agenda additions, including the
following:
With
the Planning Commission meeting only once a month, and with no
one looking and no agenda being either posted, noticed or sent to
us or others, why, just about anything can, and WILL happen, as these
Cisar-Dalmasso-Green-George-Botting-Developer-led code changes slip-slide
their way through with no public oversight whatsoever. Slick as, well,
you-know.... SOMETHING FOR CITIZENS TO KEEP
IN MIND: It's not necessarily the lack of enforcement
of the building codes that is the problem, it's the continual
degradation and watering down of the codes themselves that eats away
at Sultan's future quality of life. And downgrading the short plat
code is a perfect example. (Although we have less problem with the
GMA-mandated in-fill development like that, than with some of the
infrastructure degradation that continues to occur. For instance,
were you aware that the planting strip between the curb and sidewalk
is only 3.5 feet? Once the soon-to-be over-sized trees planted in
that teensy-tiny little strip begin stretching out their root systems,
why, the sidewalks and streets will be no match for them.) |
OLDER
STORIES/ITEMS....
- More
"Developing News"
- PC
AGENDA (in Word) - Although we did not attend the 1/4/05 PC meeting,
during which the "relevance" of the Sultan Planning Commission
was discussed, we have ordered a copy of the audio tape. The
"relevance" of the Commission, the newest pet subject
of Commissioner Dalmasso, is outrageous. And if you are not mad at the
very concept of discontinuing this advisory body, then that is indeed
part of the problem. The leadership at City hall -- both
mayoral, the City Administrator and city council -- is to blame, . First,
because of their silence during the harassment of Josie Fallgatter and
Jeff Kirkman, and secondly due to their "encouragement" of
this, and other, city government positions; indeed, public participation
in general. If the city would put forth the same PR effort and encouragement
of public participation as they do for, say, Sultan's Centennial, the
Annual Sultan Photo, the Shindig, the numerous grants the city receives,
and other "positive" City events, perhaps people who value
Sultan's future quality of life would be anxious to step up to the plate
and serve, rather than hide in the shadows. Or, indeed, hear of the
opportunity in the first place.
- IN
THE "IF
ONLY" Category: If only the city leadership would expend as
much energy encouraging people to get excited about becoming involved
in their government as they do on the city's "feel good"
or "Aren't we the greatest?!" promotional activities, one
can't help but wonder how much more taxpayer-friendly some of the City's
decisions might be.
-
PC Meeting/hearings on 11/16: Sultan's annexation policy
has been passed onto council for a council hearing; the hearing on Sultan's
Engineering Standards has been continued until Tuesday, Dec. 7th.
Plng. Commission members had insufficient time to review this 3-inch
high document, and even Ray George, who is a P. E., only got about one-third
of the way through it. Detailed comments and/or suggested revisions
were made by Commissioners Fallgatter and George. (Boy, was it great
to hear substantial input given by a commissioner -- other than Josie
and/or Jeff -- who has actually reviewed a city document in depth enough
to offer meaningful comments. Kudos to Commissioner George. CORRESPONDENCE/TESTIMONY
FROM BARCLAYS NORTH: 11/16/04
letter on proposed EDDS (Engineering Stds.) and on the
Proposed Annexation Policy.
- Ord.
867-04 2004 Budget Amendment (and back-up, in Acrobat, 465 kb file),
and a
- Info and
links on Hwy. 2 Signage issue: Sultan's
Chap. 22, Sign Code (in Word),
several links
of interest re SCENIC VISTAS ACT
(in Word)
and the placement of signs on US 2, and a transcription of the result
of Councilman
Jim Flower's research on this subject (in Word),
given at the 10/25 Hwy. 2 Safety Coalition meeting.
- Transcription
of Public Comments, 10-20-04 Council sewer connection fee hearing,
by L. Storm, R. Kistenmacher and K. George (in
Word)
- The
|