|
11/15/07
Agenda Documents & Links to AUDIO
HEARINGS:
6:00
PM - HEARING -
2008 FINAL BUDGET (2 mb pdf) Audio for the hearing has
have been split into separate files; see below)
SLIDE
SHOW - The 15-slide PowerPoint hard copy presentation distributed
at the Hearing. Good thing, too, as the PPT/Notebook decided to be finicky,
and refused to work.
AUDIO:
There are a total of 7 MP3s files:
- Audio
A1, 11:45 min., 2.0 mb: Summary of Final Changes, Investments,
etc. - Administrator Deborah Knight's presentation/summary (PPT
Slides #1 thru #8)
- Audio
A2, 2:39 min., 467 kb:
Finance - Clerk/Deputy Finance Director Laura Koenig presentation
(PPT Slide #9)
- Audio
A3, 2:06 min., 371 kb: Grants & Econ. Development - D.
Knight, filing in for absent Donna Murphy (Slide #10)
- Audio
A4, 8:23 min., 1.5 mb: Public Safety Goals - Interim
Police Chief Larry Marshall (Slide #11)
- Audio
A5, 3:39 min., kb:
Planning & Building Dept. - Rick Cisar (Slide #12)
- Audio
A6 5:30 min., 1.0 mb:
Public Works Dept. - Public Works Director Connie Dunn (Slides
#13 & #14)
- Audio
A7, 1:13 min., 216 kb:
Recommended Action - D. Knight (Slide #15)
6:30
PM 2007 - HEARING - 2007
Amendments to 2007 Budget (586 kb
pdf) Audio
File B, 6:46 min., 1.2 mb.
COUNCIL
MEETING:
7:00
PM CALL TO ORDER - Pledge of Allegiance, Roll Call and Changes
to Agenda (Audio
File C, 45 sec. 135 kb) - Mayor Tolson removes Action Item #7, Res.
07-24, "Interest Distribution Policy" Read
associated excerpt from Transcription.
COMMENTS
FROM THE PUBLIC:
- Steve
Fox, Commissioner for Snohomish Co. Fire Dist. #5 (Audio
File D-1, 3:59 min. 702 kb ) - Re error in 10/25/07 Minutes (Joint
Council/PB Mtg); restates FD5's several requests regarding city's plans
for road crossing their property.
- Loretta
Storm (Audio
File D-2, 3:06 min., 547 kb) - Costs to do take yet another whack
at Sultan's Comprehensive Plan, trying to make it compliant.
- Josie
Fallgatter (Audio
File D-3, 3:14 min., 572 kb) - Sultan's CP Consultant (Shockey)
stated 11/13/07 that the CP compliance was "80% done" so another
$400,000 to make it compliant seems excessive. City needs a consultant
who understands the GMA.
- Gerry
Gibson (Audio
File D-4, 4:24 min., 775 kb) - Re the Dyer Road residents' proposed
comp plan docket amendment; takes umbridge with proposed Dyer Road sewer
line as shown in current Comp Plan; asks about details re Twin Rivers
developer donations.
- Jeff
Beeler (Audio
D-5, 2:15 min., 397 kb) - Appreciates the yellow middle-lane striping
on SBR's hill, but the bottom of the hill is very dark and also needs
better defintion. Re 14% incresae in city's employee health care costs,
as a small independent business owner, when those costs rise too high
has to reassess and adjust his coverage accordingly, and suggests the
City does the same.
- L. Storm
(Audio
File D-6 47-sec., 140 kb) - Follow-up statement re making new Comp
Plan consultants accountable for final product as part of otheir contract.
COUNCILMEMBER
COMMENTS: Audio
file of all 3:39 min., 644 kb
STAFF
REPORTS - Written
Reports Submitted [we assume "submitted" means department
heads have given written reports to the City Admiistrator.]
[G.R.I.T.
NOTE: As usual, the city chose not to include these reports in the
council's agenda packet. If Citizens want to read the reports, they
will have to submit a separate Public Disclosure Request with the City
of Sultan. Click
here for information on how to do this. Once again, we urge the
city include these reports in the agenda packet; based on our previous
experience, substantial information and decision-making criteria is
often contained within these reports which should be shared with citizens
and taxpayers.]
CONSENT
AGENDA: Audio
File 1:15 minutes
1. Approval
of the October 25, 2007 Joint Meeting Minutes [Note: Mayor
Tolson pulled these for correction, based on comments made by Fire District
#5 Commissioner Steve Fox.]
2. Approval
of Vouchers
3. Adoption
of Ordinance 966-07 - 2008 Tax Levy
4. Adoption
of Ordinance 965-07 - 2008 Tax Levy - Police Bonds
5.
Adoption of Ordinance 967-07 - Capital Project Fund REET 1
NOTE:
Consent Agenda Items 5 through 10 contain the same information and
are the same document. We have therefore linked the document only
once, to Consent Item #5 above.
6. Adoption
of Ordinance 968-07 - Capital Project Fund REET 2 (see Consent Item
#5)
7. Adoption of Ordinance 969-07 - Park Impact Fund (see Consent Item
#5)
8. Adoption of Ordinance 970-07 - Transportation Impact Fund (see
Consent Item #5)
9. Adoption of Ordinance 971-07 - Stormwater Utility Fund (see Consent
Item #5)
10.
Adoption of Ordinance 977-07 - Repeal Chapter 16.112.100 [see Consent
Item #5)
11. Adoption
of Ordinance 974-07 - Amend Title 13.12 Disconnection Fees
12. Interlocal
Agreement with Snohomish County - Emergency Management
13. Interlocal
Agreement with MRSC for Rosters
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Ordinance
972-02 2008 Budget (80 kb pdf) - 1st Reading - AUDIO
G-1 54 seconds, 161 kb [NOTE: There was an unnoticed typo in this
ordinance number. It is shown in the city's agenda as 972-02
when it should have been 972-07.]
2. Ordinance
973-07 2007 Budget Amendment (586 kb pdf) - 1st Reading - AUDIO
G-2, 49 seconds, 145 kb
3. Ordinance
975-07 2008 Salary Schedule (775 kb pdf) - 1st Reading - AUDIO
G-3, 5:03 min., 891kb
4. Ordinance
976-07 2008 Capital Budget (407 kb pdf)- 1st Reading - AUDIO
G-4, 3:25 min., 602 kb
[G.R.I.T.
NOTE: As explained by City Administrator Knight during the meeting
-- read
the associated transcription -- an ordinance was not required for
the Capital Budget action, merely a discrete vote re the 2008 Budget
(remember, there was a mistake on that ordinance number as well, published
as 972-02 when the correct number is 972-07, creating
further confusion). Who owned that mistake?
QUESTION:
This raises a question re the process, assignment and disposition
of Resolution and Ordinance numbers. After a number has been assigned
and published in a City's agenda, but changed or left an orphan, will
it be placed back into the "pool" of available numbers and
reassigned to a new council legislative action, or will it be "deleted"?
This was not the only councilmatic action that evening to cause confusion:
Resolution 07-23 approving the City's Investment Policy was redesignated
07-30 during the meeting, and the resolution setting the annual
Payroll Allocation -- originally designated 07-21 -- was renamed 07-29.
ALSO,
Res. 07-24 "Interest Distribution Policy" was pulled from
the agenda altogether, because of "midnight hour" questions
raised re the legality of transferring $9,064 of Transportation Impact
Fee funds to the General Fund for general use to help balance the 2007
budget. Information obtained after the council meeting verified that
the city's source for this recommendation was a statement made by Stan
Finkelstein of the AWC during the Oct. 17th Sultan Blue Ribbon CAP meeting.
The logical conclusion is that the City Attorney does not review any
resolution, ordinance or other legal city executive actions except when
specifically requested, or to review it as a regular procedure as to
the corrections of its form, not substance. On ever ordinance, in additon
to the Clerk's and Mayor's signatures, the signature line reserved for
the city attorney states: "Approved as to form." This raises
questions as to staff's knowledge, ability and qualification to authorize
such legislative actions based on assumptions.
FINALLY
-- and I REALLY hate to "start in" on Mayor-elect Carolyn
Eslick even before the poor woman takes the Oath of Office, I have a
significant concern. She has stated in at least two public venues (a
recent Chamber of Commerce meeting and during the Toastmasters' 9./25
SHS Debate) that she believes the city would save money by excluding
the city attorney from many (most?) council meetings. Bottom line: The
attorney serves at the mayor's pleasure; He/she either follows the mayor's
direction or finds another job. Therefore, Mayor-elect Eslick will have
complete control over Mr. Graafstra's (or whomever's) effectiveness
in council. Given the City's recent legal entanglements, I would suggest
this is not a good time to begin cutting corners on legal advice and
guidance.]
5. Resolution
07-21 - Payroll Allocation (137 kb pdf) - AUDIO
G-5, 2:25 min., 427 kb [G.R.I.T. NOTE: This resolution was corrected
to 07-29; per L. Koenig, "because of a duplication."]]
6. Resolution
07-23 - Investment Policy (173 kb pdf) - AUDIO
G-6, 2:10 min., 358 kb - [G.R.I.T. NOTE: This resolution # was
changed to 07-30; read
the associated transcription]
7. Resolution
07-24 - Interest Distribution Policy (417 kb, pdf) - AUDIO
- There was no audio for this item since it was pulled from the agenda;
see brief verbal comment on this item and associated transcription in
Action Item #6, "Resolution 07-23 - Investment Policy" above.
[G.R.I.T. NOTE: This resolution was pulled from the Action Agenda by Mayor
Tolson, for the following reason: "Conflict between what the RCW
(state law) says and what AWC has been informing the City.]
8. Resolution
07-27 - Purchase Policy (619 kb pdf)
- AUDIO G-7, 1:55 min. 342 kb
9. Everett
Animal Shelter Interlocal Agreement (331 kb pdf) - AUDIO
G-8, 9:32 min., 1.8 mb
10. Comprehensive
Plan Amendment to 2007 Annual Docket (2.0 mb pdf) - AUDIO
G-9, 2:49 min., 496 kb
11. Caimcross
& Hempelmann Professional Service Agreement (311 kb pdf) - AUDIO
SPLIT INTO SEVEN SEPARATE FILES BELOW:
- Audio
G10- A (3:39 min., 645 kb): City Admin. Knight's summary re Comp
Plan deadlines and city's inability to meet Growth Mgt. Hearings Board's
imposed deadlines for submittal of compliant documents of 12/31/07 for
a compliant TIP, and 1/28/08 for a compliant CFP.
- Audio
G10-B (6:20 min., 1.1 mb): City Admin. Knight summarizes issues/problems
at hand; second issue is to decide whether to use a Land Use specialist
attorney.
- Audio
G10-C (6:59 min., 1.2 mb): Discussion....
- City Admin. Knight attempts to outline specific costs, which are
"squishy," and explains council's three choices: Use in-house
staff, use current Comp Plan consultant Reid Shockey, or use land
use attorney.
- Disagrees with some citizens holding the perception that city
staff has been "standing in the way" of a compliant comp
plan, as the city has "given the process over to the consultants."
- C/M Jim Flower makes (his first) motion (amended later).
- Further General Discussion (Description for this portion of
this agenda item will be "filled in" later; and we also hope
to do a full transcription.)
PUBLIC
COMMENT ON AGENDA ITEMS ONLY:
COUNCILMEMBER
RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENT ON AGENDA ITEMS: AUDIO
FILE I, 1:35 min., 281 kb - Comments mostly "Thanks for coming,"
"Have a nice Thanksgiving" or both, with the exception of C/M
Blair, who explained to citizens that brief, or no, discussion re action
items does not reflect extensive work behind the scenes on those issues.
|