|
2003 SULTAN'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (For the most current iteration of Comp plans and EIS, visit Jeff Everett's Council Website (www.sultancitycouncil.com) |
Talk about this subject in our Discussion Forum G.R.I.T.'s Comprehensive Plan Page (main) G.R.I.T.'s Capital Faciliites Plan page TRANSCRIPTIONS: Several transcriptions have been done on the PC comp plan process. Check out our Transcriptions page MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS? As we've been taught, some folks in Sultan are more equal than others. but THIS example takes the prize: Commissioner Dalmasso's explanation of how the comp plan growth scenario should be selected (Word, Acrobat). Here's Dalmasso's matrix to help explain the justification for his "reasoning." if you aren't outraged about his discriminatory position, then YOU may be part of the problem. PLANNING COMMISSIONERS' CONTACT INFO: You can mail or drop off letters to commissioners at city hall. Their names are shown below, along with their emails: Chairman
John Seehuus |
||
2003 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DRAFT EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) COMPLETE 9.3 MB FILE OF THIS 291-PAGE DOCUMENT (click mouse's right button to activate download and save menu) DOCUMENT BROKEN UP INTO SEVERAL SMALLER FILES (each approx. 300-350 kb). We can provide a copy if you contact us (we're listed in the phone directory).- We will provide a CD of this Comprehensive Plan if you contact us. ho spent several hours scanning in this 291-page document.
|
|||
|
COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE DRAFT EIS: Here are the comments that were received on the DEIS (all in Acrobat):
|
|
||
|
TRANSCRIPTIONS OF HEARINGS AND MEETINGS:
|
|||
| WELL, ISN'T THIS A HEAD-SCRATCHER? (Haven't we learned by now that many of the city's seemingly-incompetent "fumblings" are truly smokescreens designed for a hidden purpose? In a fairly bizarre "Special" planning commission meeting, commissioners approved (with rush, last-minute, little-time-for-review changes) a draft Comprehensive Plan for publication, distribution and comment. The good news is that this document will be made available for public review. The highly questionable news is that "obstacles" seem to exist in providing the comp plan in electronic format on a CD. We can't imagine why this would be a problem, except for the fact the city will charge $25 per hard copy of the plan. (But, hey, I'd be willing to fork over $50 to get the plan electronically.) But the really bad news is that this was a hurry-up, basically unpublicized meeting (only two days' notice -- some planning members seemed to know about the meeting, but it was a surprise to 2-3 others) which, because of its "Special" nature, excluded public comment. Planning Comissioners only received the final draft document one or two days prior, with little time for review. Even more bizarre is Plng. Director Rick Cisar's response to Commissioner Kraut's clarifying question at the 1-4-03 meeting as to the purpose of the meeting; a response that clearly indicated it was for discussion and informational-only purposes and that no action was to be taken. In fact, it was the ONLY reason for the meeting. The explanation given last night the rush, "special" nature (other than the possibility that a park grant fund might be missed) was the state-mandated 6/30/03 completion date. (GMA deadline statutes [in Word] were revised last year, moving updates from a five-year to seven-year cycle. In reality, this plan is already two years overdue in any event, so we're not sure of the reasons for the bum's rush.) |
|
||
|
|
|||