TRANSCRIPTION
– RE WILD SKY
(SULTAN
COUNCIL PUBLIC COMMENT EXCERPTS FROM APRIL 13, 2005 MEETING)
Bill Pearson’s Public Comment re Wild
Sky
(And Councilman Flower’s response to
those comments)
(Made during City of
Bill Pearson I think I’d like to comment from up (sic) on
that. Council, I would like to -- my name is Bill
Pearson. I’ve been in the Valley here
for 25 years. I’m 77 years old. I’m very proud to be an American. I served in World War II overseas, and I’ve
been here and been a logger all my life.
We’ve built roads. And years ago,
the timber they sold was – half of that went to, the [unintelligible] of that went to
schools. I think it’s the most
devasticatin’ (sic) thing that ever could happen in
[Mr. Pearson continues his
Wild Sky comments at the close of the meeting, related to newspaper article
noting that the Forest Service may close campgrounds and some of the
trailheads: “You know why? They ain’t
got no money.
There’s no logging going on. There’s
no timber revenue. My dad and I, we
built the road to Pomona Mine up here in 1950 or ’49. I was 23 at that time. I hauled logs out of where we get all of our
water,
Storm No, they’re not.
Pearson My dad’s got [unintelligible]. My dad’s
gone. He couldn’t go up to them
summertime lakes and whatever. It says
right here in the [unintelligible]
people that have motor homes or buy snowmobiles. That’s industry. You need industry, I
don’t care what you got. We don’t have
logging. We gotta have something to pay
the cops. Or something
to pay your gas bill or whatever.
I think it’s the worst thing, and I’m very, very proud to come here
and…Mr. Boucher, he’s in here also on this.
And I don’t know [if] she’s [referring
to the Herald’s letter-write, I think] a registered voter, but she’s on the
backside. And when I read the paper
again, I don’t come off [get mad?], but when I do, I want to get a
response. And I wanna thank the committee
[council]. And I’d like to handle (sic)
this over, and let you know what the Forest Service [is] doing. They’re broke. They’re even selling their buildings. They’ve been taken the roads out. And so I
think it’s the worst thing that could ever happen. We have a clear cut….if we’ve had it 10
years, you’d never know it looks like a [unintelligible]
field. It looks
beautiful. You fight a fire, not with a
bucket of water, but a helicopter and jillions and billions of dollars? You’re takin’ the roads a lot out there, that
cost all of us taxpayers money to put them roads in, and you’re taking them
out. Leave them alone and they’ll all
lose some stuff and in ten years you’d never know the difference. No. We take it out, tear it all out, seal it with hay.
What [sounds like “a spot”]? Wake up,
Jim Flower’s Response to Bill Pearson’s
comments:
Thank
you, Mr. Pearson, for coming to one of our council meetings and expressing your
passion. I do appreciate the fact that
you’ve contributed so much in your lifetime to this valley and to its
industries. We’ve seen a lot of changes,
and we value that. We have echoed your
passion for maintaining property rights and maintaining just good old common
sense in dealing with these issues. I
also wanted to reply that when we had flooding issues, are we putting the logs
IN the river when we should be pulling them out. There’s so much that the powers that be above
us, really make no sense. So we strive in our own way to try to point
out the folly, or the fallacy with some things when we can, and that was the
effort behind our resolution opposing Wild Sky.
LORETTA STORM’S PUBLIC COMMENTS DURING
THIS SAME 4-13-05 MEETING
(and Jim
Flower’s response to those comments)
Storm: As
you all know, the subject of public participation is near and dear to my heart,
so I’d like to point out one or two of my concerns of events that transpired during the
March 9th and 23rd council meetings related to the
anti-Wild Sky Resolution. But first I need to back up a couple of days. April 10th marked an “anniversary”
of sorts for my husband and I: It marked five years that we have been
working to raise the awareness of the City and its officials that
ill-considered actions of the present will substantially effect Sultan’s future
financial situation and its future quality of life. Decisions that will affect
citizens living both inside – and outside – the city limits of Sultan. Over that entire five-year period, we have
been subjected to constant and intense scrutiny and criticism, both in print
and in this chamber, to the effect that we should either not be allowed to
speak at all or that we should not be listened to because we do not reside
within Sultan’s city limits.
Then comes
Mr. Hussman March 9th with a draft resolution, asking that the
council oppose Wild Sky, an issue about which he feels passionate. That is
certainly his right as a citizen, and I applaud him for his zeal. The infectiousness of his passion was evident
during the council’s next meeting, during which it unanimously passed his resolution,
enthusiastically rejecting the need for a public hearing.
What I find baffling is that
Mr. Hussman does not reside within the city limits, yet his words were received
by council members like manna from heaven.
Copies of his draft resolution were immediately distributed to all
council members – as well as a copy of a letter from Mt. Baker Snoqualmie
National Forest Supervisor Director John Phipps to Rep. Jennifer Dunn – without
any legal review or questioning as to the propriety of the distribution. In the
past, either the mayor or the city attorney has short-stopped documents for
review before passing them along to council members, so this permissive action
on an issue of such long-term import gave the distinct impression that either
the resolution had previously been reviewed and approved, or that the City
regularly participates in arbitrary and capricious behavior, that there are two
sets of rules, one which applies to Friends of the City and one which applies
to individuals making statements the City would prefer not to hear.
My second comment is in the
form of two questions and a statement:
Do the recommendations read by the mayor of the decorum to be followed
in making public comments apply only to the public, or are council members also
obliged to follow those same guidelines? And, is the mayor obliged to interrupt
anyone making inappropriate comments,
while those comments are being made? If
the answer to both questions is yes, then I am requesting an apology for the
manner in which I was treated for comments I made on Wild Sky at the close of
the last meeting -- from Councilman Boucher, for the manner in which he
responded to my comments, and for Mayor Tolson’s failure to interrupt him.
Thank you for allowing me to
speak. I am providing a copy of this
statement and request that it be made a permanent part
of the City’s Minutes for this meeting.
Councilman Jim Flower’s Response to
Storm Comments:
Flower Miss Storm, you made a few points, and I would like to
respond to them. First, you pointed out
that you’ve made a five-year career of educating the public…as to the problems
with the City. You lament that you are
not given due respect. And you lament
that you aren’t heard as well as you would like to be. At this point I’d like to offer a little bit
of critical advice, if you don’t mind.
When you only hear negative(s) from one person for an extended period of
time and you never hear anything positive, at all, then you can only assume
that this person cannot be pleased. Now,
that may not be true in your instance, but it is an appearance of never
acknowledging the good. And, um…I think
many of us take exception to that, when we’ve tried so hard to make this a good
community; we do so much volunteer work, such as we see around us with the
Centennial Committee and their, uh, their efforts to celebrate what we had, and
the reasons that none of us live here because we’re forced to. We don’t live here by choice (sic). Now, I understand you do volunteer time at
the Library Board, and that is appreciated.
But every now and then I’d like to hear something good, because I know
that we’re not perfect, but we’re not all bad, either. And you just might get a little bit more
tit-for-tat if you congratulated someone, some time for some thing that we have
been right. And I see your husband
smirking over there as if he’s just [unintelligible]
bored, but there’s more to this. You
take exception to Councilman Boucher’s comments at the close of the last
meeting. You take his words as
insulting. I listened to a recording
carefully of that comment. And I find
Councilman Boucher’s to be measured. I found him to be polite.
Ray
Kistenmacher Please.
Tolson Let’s not have a dialogue here.
Flower He was not insulting in any way. And he merely pointed out some contradictions
in your agenda. And I think that if you,
with an open mind, review that again, you will find that no insults and no
impropriety was sent your way. Uh, he didn’t care to make a comment on that,
but in defense of not just him, but the council as a whole, I believe that you
have been treated with a decent amount of respect, and where you may not feel
like we do things your way, you are here at every meeting, [with] what seems to
be just looking for a trip wire, instead of taking the good with the bad. A little bit of good would speak loudly from
your corner. That’s all I have. Thank you.
CLOSING PUBLIC COMMENTS
Ray Kistenmacher’s Comments (In response to Councilman
Flower’s comments re L. Storm)
Everyone enjoys getting
positive strokes, but no one expects a police officer to pull them over, and compliment
them for obeying all the traffic laws.
Neither should you expect a citizen watchdog to compliment the city for
following its laws. I know people don’t
like to be told they are doing something wrong, but if no one does, then things
go very wrong, very fast. As far as
volunteering time, I would hazard a confident guess that Loretta and I have volunteered
more time than almost anyone in this room.
And it has not been for accolades.
We simply feel that someone must keep the actions of government both
open to view and accountable. It is not
our job to be sycophants. As for Mr.
Boucher’s comments being polite and respectful, I would say you [i.e., Flower] must
have grown up with a much different set of standards in that regard.
Loretta Storm’s Public Comments (also in response to
Councilman Flower’s Response to her comments)
Storm Jim, I want to thank you for your comments. They were well taken, and I knew most [chuckles] of them, but it’s, it’s good that you aired them and I appreciate your
honesty. I would like to ask you – when
it’s your time to comment, if you wish to do so – where you heard the recording of Mr. Boucher’s comments? But --
Flower On your website.
Storm I figured that.
In addition to all the hours we spend updating the website and trying –
I mean, we have an agenda, of course, but we also offer a place where people
can come for
information. And, and that’s, that’s the main reason we started the
website. But in addition to that, I am a
Library Board member. I give me time
there. And a Friends –
a member of the Friends of the Library.
I, uh, dedicate some time to sales, to help them in their sales. Um, I am developing a website for the
Friends. I am now Secretary – temporary Secretary, hopefully [chuckles] of the Highway 2 Safety
Coalition, which, which you know. So we
do¸ you know, we do a lot of positive things other than just cover the council
meetings and make that information available to people. So…but anyway, thank you.