Frequently Asked Questions About the

Wild Sky Wilderness Proposal

1: Will the Wild Sky Wilderness proposal affect private property rights?

 

A: No. Wilderness designation will not adversely affect private property.  Wilderness designations only apply to federally owned lands. If you own property outside the wilderness boundary (even land near or adjacent to the federal wilderness) wilderness designation does not infringe on your ability to use or develop your land.  In fact, studies show that property values go up in areas that are near protected federal lands and rivers.

 

If you own land completely inside the designated wilderness area (often called an “inholding”), management restrictions for wilderness areas do not apply to private land.  Property owners must be assured adequate access to their parcels, and that could include permission to drive through the wilderness. The Wild Sky Wilderness does not allow the government to take over private land. It authorizes the Forest Service to acquire “inholdings” if there is a willing seller.


2: Are hunting and fishing prohibited in wilderness areas?

 

A:  No. Hunting and fishing are allowed in National Forest Wilderness areas.  Many hunters and anglers prize wilderness for its hunting and fishing opportunities, and for the ability to hunt without having game harassed or habitat degraded by motorized vehicles. The only exception is in wilderness in national parks, where hunting is usually prohibited because of the underlying national park legislation which prohibits hunting. This does not apply to the Wild Sky because it is National Forest.


3: Doesn’t Wilderness restrict recreational opportunities?

A: If designated, the Wild Sky Wilderness would provide for a broad array of outdoor recreational opportunities, including hiking, camping, hunting, fishing, canoeing, kayaking, swimming, picnicking, backpacking, bird watching, taking wildflower walks, horseback riding, cross-country skiing, snowshoeing, rock-climbing, ecological research, and educational programs.

Motorized use including dirt bikes, snowmobiles and off-road vehicles are prohibited in Wilderness. However, the Wild Sky Wilderness proposal was crafted to make sure that some of the most-used motorized recreational opportunities were preserved outside of the proposal. For example, the Windy Ridge area adjacent to the proposal is highly used by snowmobilers and Reiter Pit on adjacent State lands is one of the premiere dirt bike venues in the State.


4: Will roads like the Jack Pass Road, Beckler River Road and the Index-Golena Road that access popular trailheads (i.e., Quartz Creek, Blanca Lake, West Cady Ridge Trail) be closed by the Wild Sky Wilderness proposal? 

A: No. The Index-Golena Road (FS Road # 63), North Fork Skykomish Road (FS Road #63), Beckler River Road (FS Road #65) and the Jack Pass Road (FS Road #65) are all outside of the wilderness proposal and public access will not be affected by a Wild Sky Wilderness designation.  These Roads were never proposed for inclusion in the Wilderness because of their importance in accessing existing recreational opportunities and popular trailheads like Blanca Lake and the Quartz Creek Trail. 


5: Has there been adequate public process and participation associated with the Wild Sky bill?

 

A: Yes. Senator Murray and Representative have made an extended effort to engage local stakeholders and the public about the Wild Sky Wilderness proposal. There have been three public meetings on the proposal in 2001, before the proposal was first introduced into Congress. Two of those events, a town hall meeting in Index and a public meeting in Monroe were in the Sky Valley and very well attended. Congressional hearings have been held on the legislation in both the 107th and 108th Congress. There has been extensive press coverage in local and regional media outlets (including the Monroe Monitor, Everett Herald, Seattle PI and Seattle Times) informing the Snohomish County public about the Wild Sky Wilderness proposal. There have been more than 200 newspaper articles, editorials, OpEds and letters to the editor on the Wild Sky Issue over the last four years.


6: Doesn't wilderness restrict use by disabled people?

A: No. Those with disabilities may use wheelchairs within wilderness. The Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 reaffirmed that nothing in the Wilderness Act should be construed as prohibiting the use of a wheelchair in a wilderness area by individuals whose disability requires it. A 1992 report by the National Council on Disability found that "[a] significant majority of persons with disabilities surveyed very much enjoy the [National Wilderness Preservation System] and 76 percent do not believe that the restrictions on mechanized use stated in the Wilderness Act diminish their ability to enjoy wilderness." The Washington Coalition of Citizens with DisAbilities has endorsed the Wild Sky Wilderness proposal.


7:  Will my dog be allowed to hike with me in the Wild Sky Wilderness?

 

A: Yes, dogs are permitted in Wilderness areas.


8: Will the Wild Sky Wilderness proposal require permits or fees to hike or camp in the area?

 

A: The only case in Washington State where a National Forest Wilderness Area has instituted a permit process to restrict visitor access is in the Enchantment Lakes area of the Alpine Lakes Wilderness.  Each year, during June 15 – October 15, individuals need to apply for a permit to use this small and heavily used area of the Wilderness. This unique permit process is a result of substantial adverse impacts on the fragile alpine ecosystem caused by extremely high use and a limited ability to recover from such impacts (due to a short growing season at high elevations).

 

The most popular areas of the Wild Sky Wilderness proposal are at lower elevations where these fragile alpine ecosystems do not occur, making the prospect of a permit system unnecessary.  Areas within the Wilderness should be accessible in the same manner as they are now. 


9: Would the risk of uncontrolled fire be greater if the Wild Sky is designated as Wilderness?

 

A: No. Wilderness designation would not increase the risk of fire.  Wildfires are infrequent on the lands proposed for Wilderness designation in the Wild Sky Wilderness bill.   Being on the rainy and cloudy "wet" side, the area gets about 80 inches in annual rainfall and as high as 200 inches in some of the higher mountains.  Also, the typical "marine flow" clouds serve as a natural cooling and humidifying system that usually keeps fire danger low even during summers that see little rain. 

 

With very few exceptions, the fires in the Wild Sky country during the last century have been human caused, including the 2 most recent large fires.  In 1967, the logging-caused Evergreen Mountain fire burned several thousand acres in the Rapid River area, and in 1989 a railroad track grinder started a fire which burned several hundred acres south of Highway 2 near Deception Creek.

 

Wilderness designation will help maintain a natural fire regime here, and by preventing the construction of new roads it will help to prevent human-caused fires from starting in this place that seldom burns on its own.  In addition, the 1964 Wilderness Act allows for flexibility to deal with catastrophic wildfires and damaging insect outbreaks should they occur.  Section 4(d)(1) of the Wilderness Act states that "such measures may be taken as necessary in the control of fires, insects and diseases" within wilderness.


10. Would designating the Wild Sky as Wilderness help or hurt local economies in the Sky Valley?

 

A: Designating the Wild Sky as Wilderness would preserve and market the remarkable recreational opportunities that already make this area so special. Visitors from throughout Washington and beyond travel up the Highway 2 corridor to hunt, fish, hike, camp, cross country ski, horseback ride, birdwatch, raft, kayak and get away from the city’s hustle and bustle in the Wild Sky area.  Along the way they eat meals, buy groceries, purchase gear, sign up for rafting, kayaking or other recreational trips, and stay overnight at hotels and vacation rentals. More than 30 local Sky Valley businesses located form Monroe to Skykomish have enthusiastically endorsed the proposal because it makes economic sense.


11: How much Wilderness do we have in Washington State?

A: Less than 10 percent of the entire land base of Washington State is protected as Wilderness. If passed the Wild Sky would become the Washington’s first Wilderness in a National Forest in nearly 20 years.

There are 30 wilderness areas in Washington State, covering 4,324,182 acres. These wilderness areas are managed by the US Forest Service, US Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Park Service, and the Bureau of Land Management. In 1984 the statewide "Washington Wilderness Act" was passed during the Reagan Administration, designating 1.03 million acres of national forest land. The "Washington Parks Wilderness Act" provided wilderness designations for the majority of lands within North Cascades, Olympic and Rainer National Parks in 1988.


12. Will designating the Wild Sky as wilderness cost $18 million?

 

No. While a congressional budget office (CBO) estimate put the cost of a Wild Sky Wilderness at $18 million, a more appropriate estimate places the cost of the Murray-Larsen proposal at a fraction of that ($2-3 million).

  • The CBO estimate incorrectly included $4 million in costs of trail construction when the legislation calls only for a study of potential new trails in the proposal and adjacent forest service lands. The cost of a trail study called for in the legislation would be about $260,000
  • An additional $7 million is inappropriately attributed to land acquisition of private lands surrounded by or adjacent to the proposal. The Wild Sky bill neither designates any private land as Wilderness nor does it mandate that any private land be acquired by the Forest Service.
  • An additional $6 million is allocated to removal of roads in the proposal based on faulty assumptions and using inflated costs. A more accurate estimate based on recent standard practices used consistently on the Skykomish Ranger district is $860,000.