![]() |
||||||
|
TRAFFIC
& TRANSPORTATION |
||||||
|
Lynnwood
during Rush Hour? |
||||||
|
LOCAL & SNOHOMISH COUNTY: Info on Regional Projects on Rt. 2 (generally)
CHANGING LANES (In Monroe)... Proposed traffic revisions to Route 2 in Monroe (in PowerPoint and Acrobat), and (previous) a letter from WSDOT traffic engineer Amir Ahmadi on this project (Word, Acrobat) What
is the Route 2 Safety Coalition? Sultan Basin Road & Rt. 2 Intersection (A new alignment? Read the grant application) 2-22-02 Meeting of ESCCC with Secty. of Transportation Doug MacDonald April, 2001 Letter from Rt. 2 Safety Coalition to Congressman Rick Larsen Comments from WSDOT about Sultan Industrial Park (in Acrobat) Comment letter from WSDOT on Traffic Impacts - 2001-2003 WSDOT-Funded Projects & Improvements - WSDOT Projects at risk LOCAL
HIGHWAY ACCIDENT DATA SULTAN'S 6-YR. ROAD PLANS:
Travelers Info & Visitor Center
|
GENERAL INFO: Traffic Impacts Page (includes traffic counts, etc.) Seattle
Times': More Gridlock? This is only our opinion, but it seems that
Governor Locke's suggested relaxation of DOE permits flies in the face
of his gridlock and salmon preservation issues. What the governor is recommending
here is: More development = More gridlock = Less Accountability from DOE
and WSDOT. STATEWIDE:
|
|||||
|
||||||
| WHEN
WILL WE SEE SOME ROADWAY RELIEF?
The Route 2 four-lane improvement is essentially "pie in the sky" and will not happen "for years, if at all," according to a traffic development engineer I spoke with January 3, 2001 (he requested that I not use his name, since this was largely his opinion, although it is based on current reports, trends and years of previous experience). However, he was kind enough to send me some information on this subject, and I'd like to pass it along to you. This is a vital subject to us, considering the already over-loaded condition of Hwy. 2, with further future impacts such as the "industrial area," further residential growth, and, of course, the proposed gravel facility. The "Sunshine" Report, which is WSDOT's 6-year plan on projects that may come to fruition, reports the following projects and their status. (By the way, the mileage post figures given represent the area of impact/construction activity, and are those little vertical white and green signposts by the side of the road at one-mile intervals.) The "20-Year Financially Constrained Plan," however, which might as well be in a "galaxy far, far away", i.e., "pie in the sky," indicates the strategy is to: "Widen to four lanes with a median-divided highway to Sultan (MP 21.42) including access purchase, and widen to 4 lanes without median through Sultan eastward [to mp 24.22]" at a cost of $38 to $49.60 million. Our WSDOT engineer friend said this "20-year" plan is mostly fantasy. Overlay (repaving) through Sultan, on RT 2 just west of Sultan Basin Road eastward, was done in the summer of 2001. The cost of this project is $582,000. Fifth
Street Traffic Light: This
project is slated to cost $0.5 million. I'm sure it will not be done simultaneously
with the overlay, since that is not the way the government does things.
The WSDOT contact listed in their Northwest Region report is Ed Conyers
206-440-4736. It is our understanding that this project is imminent. Neither the state or the city has sufficient motivation or funds to resolve the problems at this intersection. They will, of course, blame inadequate funding on I-695. But our government has been spending money for years on what THEY wanted and not what WE wanted -- for instance, adequate roads and rapid transit. Put simply: WSDOT has been eating their desert for years, and now they want US to eat the main course, which tastes suspicously like liver. Monroe Bypass (design phase only): The entry in the Sunshine report states that this $1.5 million expenditure is to "Prepare design report and environmental for Monroe Bypass." This covers the area contained between mileage markers (those little green vertical signs with numbers on them next to the highway at one-mile intervals) 14.25 and 16.12. The money thus far expended is $1,043,676.48 with an authorized cap of $1.5 million. The last entry shown in the status line is "Record of Decision June 01 1999P." Not sure that that means, except it's undoubtedly been buried under tons of BS, or "Bureacratic SNAFUs". SEE LINK TO RTID (Regional Transportation Improvement District) AT TOP OF THIS PAGE for current status.) |
||||||
|
HISTORICAL
STORIES ABOUT HIGHWAY 2 (Gain a perspective) PROBLEM INTERSECTIONS (Safety):
DOT
SURVEYING ON ROUTE 2 IN SULTAN: On Friday, December 1, 2000, we spoke with Pat McCormick (206-368-4493), DOT's person in charge of this project in DOT's Bothell office, and asked the purpose of the DOT survey crews along Route 2 over the last couple of weeks. He said that someone (a department or persons unknown to him) at DOT recommended and approved that a "Pavement Life" resurfacing take place along Route 2. When they made that recommendation, they also discovered that there was no "as built" survey information on file -- i.e., no electronic records -- in order to allow them to send out for bids. He said this repaving would take place next Spring, even though the roadway through Route 2 was essentially repaved last year with the installation of the Owens Road stoplight and the left-turn lane enhancements. He also said this "Pavement Life" resurfacing is required due to the anticipated long delay that will exist until and if such time that any actual structural improvements - such as an enhancement to four lanes or any Sultan Basin Road rechannelization -- will occur in this section, and that person(s) at the DOT are concerned that the pavement might disintegrate before those improvements can be made. Is that enough information for you? Or is it more than you wish to know? If you wish to know more details regarding the long-term projects planned for Route 2, you can call DOT"s Snohomish County Project Manager, Steve Miller, at 206-440-4676. He's Mr. McCormick's boss. (BACK TO TOP)
|
||||||